Movies in May: Grab some popcorn and watch Mansfield Park with me!

Do you love films based on Jane Austen’s work or life, well, then you’ll love our theme this month. Grab your popcorn and a soda! It’s time for Movies in May!

I really love watching and re-watching period movies. But one of the best parts comes from catching all those little period details that I missed the last time I saw the movie.  My sons and my husband have even learned to enjoy my period films, in large part because of the history discussion that is part of the event. I’d love the share the same experience with you.


 

Mansfield Park is not the popular favorite Jane Austen work by any means. But I confess, I really like it. And there’s a lot of great stuff to talk about in it, so pull out the popcorn and a comfy spot on the couch and join the four part group watch of Mansfield Park. I’ve embedded a youtube link below. Today we’re going to watch from the beginning to the 17 minute mark.

The issue of adoption

We begin with a very young Fanny Price going to Mansfield Park. In this era, there were no formal adoption laws in England. Families with many children often sent children to better-off relatives. In some cases, like that of Jane Austen’s brother, those relatives, if childless, could ‘adopt’ that child and make him heir to the fortune.

I could not find the reference again (naturally) in time for this post, but I do remember reading that Jane Austen was not in favor of such adoptions. She felt the loss of her brother keenly. So it is not surprising that she should portray Fanny’s life as relatively sad and lonely.  (If any of you has the reference to this, I’d love for you to post it in the comments.)

In the Bertram family, an heir was not needed. Fanny was styled as a companion for her Aunt Bertram who would doubtless lose the company of her daughters when they married. In the original manuscript (as opposed to the movie script) Fanny was supposed to have been taken in by her Aunt Norris, who conveniently made her Sir Thomas’s responsibility. This seems as one more reflection of Austen’s attitude toward the practice.

Fanny’s place in the family was clearly that of the poor relation. She was clearly above the servants, but not equal to the daughters of the house. The quality of her gown, in darker colors, rougher fabrics and less stylish cuts make her position clear. Light colors, especially white, and fine, difficult to clean fabrics like silks were a mark of wealth and station which Fanny does not enjoy. Such colors indicated that the family could afford the servants and the soap necessary to keep such impractical colors clean.

Battledore and Shuttlecocks

Fanny and Edmund are shown playing a game of battledore and shuttlecocks on the lawn. The game was commonly played and considered quite healthful and appropriate for young ladies.

Girl’s Own Book (1833) offers the following explanation:

This game is too well known to need much description The shuttlecock sometimes called the bird is a little ball stuck full of feathers the battledores are covered with parchment and the object of the players is to keep the bird constantly passing and re passing in the air by means of striking it with the battledores. Some people become so expert at it that they can keep it up more than a thousand times without once allowing it to fall Little girls should not be afraid of being well tired that will do them good but excessive fatigue should be avoided especially where it is quite unnecessary. 

Jane Austen played the game herself with her nephews, writing to her sister of their practice and improvement in the activity.

Inside the house, Maria and Julia are engaged in other ladylike pursuits, playing the piano for Maria’s suitor, Mr. Rushworth, under the watchful eye of their Aunt Norris. Young women were always chaperoned in company.

A subtext of slavery

A theme underlying the overall story of Mansfield Park is that of slavery.

Sir Thomas expresses concerns about their interests in the West Indies. Since the 17th century, wealthy English families invested in plantations in the West Indies and shipped crops back to England to sell. Such plantations provided 80% of England’s imported goods. Sugars, rum, cotton, cocoa, coffee, mahogany, and tobacco were the biggest export goods. High demand and high taxes on these goods fostered a strong black market so smuggling and piracy were prevalent problems. Slave troubles on the plantations often plagued these interests as well. So there were likely plenty of concerns for Sir Thomas to attend to.

Dear Aunt Norris

In Sir Thomas’s absence, Aunt Norris’s role becomes even clearer. Sir Thomas explicitly give Julia into her aunt’s care suggesting that Aunt Norris is filling the role of governess or companion for her niece. While Aunt Bertram should be taking the role of mistress of the estate, running household matters, and caring for the local poor, her more active sister has taken on many of those responsibilities, effectively usurping her sister as mistress of the estate.

At the 9 minute mark, her statement about positioning herself to receive news of Sir Thomas’s possible demise first reveals that she is reading the mail before Lady Bertram gets it. In the era, one did not read someone else’s letters, so for her to be doing so suggests a great deal of brashness and even impropriety on her part. It also reveals the passivity of both her sister and Sir Thomas who both tolerate her intrusions into the household. In short, not only are the children out of order, but the parental authorities are as well.

About Mr. Rushworth

One thing Aunt Norris has not been trusted with is Maria’s wedding to Rushworth, which has to be put off until Sir Walter’s return.  In the Regency era, engagements were generally swift affairs with weddings often following in less than six weeks. Long engagements were frowned upon and Sir Thomas’s insistence on an extended engagement is notable.

Mr. Rushworth is richer than even Mr. Darcy, with twelve thousand pounds a year. It is quite possible that his income exceeded that of the Bertrams. Title alone did not necessarily guarantee wealth, particularly if there were debts and problems with distant interests. We will later learn of Tom’s propensity to gamble, hinting that the Bertram fortune may not be safe from depletion.

The privileges of the elder son

In Sir Thomas’ absence, Thomas, his heir and eldest son is free to pursue the privilege of his rank. He is a gentleman, and as such, need not engage in a profession or preparing for one. With his father to manage the estate, there is little for Thomas to do but seek his own pleasure. In London and New Market, he escapes any responsibility that might fall on him—leaving it to Edmund—and indulges as many young dandies of the age, in gambling on cards, horses, or whatever else might strike his fancy, fine clothes, food, wine and lodging, and most likely in the services of the highest class of public woman he can afford. Like his peers, he spends and gambles freely, with little concern for how (or when) his bills will be paid.

Enter the Crawfords

Henry and Mary Crawford are much more appealing than Mr. Rushworth though, with their stylish dress and manners. Their opinions about marriage reflect common opinion that matrimony really was a business transaction in which one tried to gain the upper hand. Although ideas of love and romance are starting to take hold in the Regency, among the upper classes, marriage as still about wealth, connections and position.

Mary Crawford’s insistence that money should be able to purchase anything further illustrates this opinion as well as a terrible ignorance of the realities of country life. Even so, Mary is clearly ready to apply all she has to the process of catching an eligible match. Her gown is scandalously low cut for day wear and is clearly designed to catch the eye of an eligible son. Low cut gowns were the norm for evening, but proper ladies did not bare so much for daytime calls.

The young people go out walking together. Julia ‘stumbles’ and complains about her ankle. Henry Crawford offers her is harm to assist her. With the behavior between the sexes strictly prescribed, this was one of the few acceptable ways Henry might pay direct attention to Julia. Lady Bertram comments that Julia is ready to be fallen in love with.  This statement reflects the passive role that women played in courtship.  A young woman did not pursue a man, or even attempt to call attention to herself, and she certainly did to permit herself to develop feelings for a man or even worse admit to them. She might receive what (subtle) attentions were offered and accept (or refuse) an offer of marriage if it were made. To do more was to seriously risk her reputation.

A lady on horseback

In the country, horseback riding was a primary source of exercise for a lady. Not only was it good exercise, but it served the practical purpose of allowing a lady a means of transportation less elaborate, and less expensive, than a carriage. Given Fanny’s role as assistant to both her aunts, such mobility would have be very convenient, allowing them to send her on errands without the inconvenience of using the carriage to transport her.

Modern sidesaddle-notice the second pommel, the ‘leaping horn

Clearly Mary does not know how to ride despite her fancy riding dress—notice how her skirts are tangled in her feet.

Regency side saddles differed from modern side saddle and as a result female riders were somewhat limited. They could not jump or ride in vigorous hunts due to the lack of the second pommel found in modern side saddles that were developed in 1830.  In modern side saddles, the ‘leaping horn’ provides additional stability for the rider’s left leg (the one in the stirrup). If you look carefully, the saddle used in the film is of the modern design! OOPS! You can clearly see the leaping horn in the film.

(After doing a little research on this, I discovered movies use modern sidesaddles because the old style ones are considered too unsafe by modern standards for actors to use.)

Pre 1830 sidesaddle–notice only one pommel.

A period correct saddle would look more like this one. There is only one pommel for the right leg and nothing to brace the left leg against, it just hangs freely in the stirrup, thus giving the rider a less secure seat.

In order to get up into the saddle, a lady required assistance.  Typically a groom would help her and she would utilize mounting blocks like these to help her get into the saddle.

Whether using a modern or a period side saddle, side saddle riders all use a riding crop or whip as a necessary part of their riding gear. The crop is not used to whip the horse, but rather is held along the right side and used to tap the horses side in place of the rider’s right knee, signaling the horse of the rider’s wishes.

Compare Mary’s riding habit to Fanny’s. The color, fabric and cut of Mary’s habit all point to Mary’s wealth and position in society. While Fanny’s habit is perfectly serviceable, the drab color and relative plainness all bespeak of Fanny’s lower social standing. She is provided with appropriate riding clothes, but ones that do not allow her to be confused with someone of higher status.

The trials of a younger son

Not only can she not ride, Mary Crawford clearly does not approve of Edmund’s plans to enter the clergy. In reality though, Edmund has few options open to him. English law did not allow an estate to be broken up among several children, so younger sons had to make their living by some other means. Another relative could leave them an estate or a fortune, but more often, they had to take a gentlemanly profession. Vicars, barristers, physicians and army officers were not paid directly for their work. They held livings, received honorarium or were paid with the interest earned off the amount paid for their commissions, thus they did not sully their hands to earn a wage, making them suitable professions for gentlemen.

To be considered for ordination, a candidate needed a degree from Cambridge or Oxford, a testimonial from his college vouching for his fitness for ordination and a bishop to satisfy  of his competency in Latin, knowledge of the Scripture, and familiarity with the liturgy and church doctrine as written in the 39 Articles. His career in the clergy would begin at age 23, as a deacon, assisting an ordained priest. At 24, he could be fully ordained and eligible to be in charge of a parish. The next challenge for the newly minted clergyman would be to find a living, a lifetime appointment to lead a parish.

Approximately 11,500 benefices or livings existed in England and Wales at the end of the 18th century. This sounds like a large number; however, over half the ordained clergy never received a living. Most great families, including the Bertrams, had at least one living to grant, so Edmund will be able to move directly into the position of vicar. Less well connected individuals could wait ten or twenty years to find a be appointed to a living.

Since livings were in such short supply, a young man would commonly seek a position as a curate, an ordained clergyman who assisted or sometimes performed the duties of a vicar. Though they might do all the work of the parish, their salaries were often meager, perhaps as little as £50 per year, not enough to afford a maid. No wonder Mary Crawford held such low regard for clergymen.

Now with our cast of players in place and the stage set, the drama can begin. Things change dramatically when Sir Thomas leaves on business. As the old saying goes, while the cat’s away, the mice will play and this is very true of the denizens of Mansfield Park.

Join us next week for part two!

You must have your share in the conversation in the comments! What did you notice? What period detail questions do you have?

 References

10 comments

Skip to comment form

    • Kristine Shore on May 6, 2016 at 7:29 am
    • Reply

    Very interesting! I had no idea about the evolution of the side-saddle.

    1. I love all these little tidbits! Makes watching the movies so much more fun. Has occasionally driven my family nuts…but that’s another story.

  1. Thank you for this! I’ve only watched this version of MP once and am planning to watch along with you. Your commentary makes the experience much more interesting!

    1. Thanks, Susan. My family seems to enjoy it too…or at least they’ve stopped giving me ‘that look’ when I do it…

    • Jeannineinsd on May 6, 2016 at 1:46 pm
    • Reply

    I will enjoy viewing this with you. Thank you for the information on the side saddle.

    In viewing the movie again I picked up some details I didn’t notice the first time. I loved Pug growling at Henry Crawford. Also I noticed that Mr. Crawford stated that when he first entered he thought Miss Price was a servant and handed her his hat.

    • Wendy on May 6, 2016 at 7:57 pm
    • Reply

    I love the idea of watching this together–great idea! I just wish that I didn’t have to wait a week to continue. I’m going to be tempted to finish the movie, now that I’ve started. It’s been too long since I’ve watched this.

  2. I adore MP; it’s long been among my favorites. I “get” Fanny; I was very much like her when I was a child and young woman, and I admire her gentle, quiet strength and her moral code that she refuses to sully by marrying Henry Crawford. She is intuitive yet not judgmental. Of all of Austen’s characters, she and perhaps Anne Elliot are most similar to my own personality.

    Aunt Norris is one of my favorite “villains” in Austen, too, and I can’t tell you how amused I am every time Filch’s cat, Mrs. Norris, appears in the Harry Potter books. 😉

    I like Edmund, too, although his admiration of Mary Crawford does lower him in my estimation a bit. But young men may easily be misled by such a one as she–who is much more subtle and skilled than Miss Bingley at “getting her man.” But Mary Crawford wants more than what Edmund can provide–wants him to be more worldly than he is or will want to be. Fanny, on the other hand, loves him as he is, despite his infatuation with the worthless Mary Crawford.

    I have yet to find a film of MP that I feel portrays Fanny well. I’m hoping that the one you link here will be better than the others I have watched.

    Thanks for doing this, Maria! 😀

    • Carole in Canada on May 8, 2016 at 5:50 pm
    • Reply

    I finally got a chance to watch this today. I am probably going to watch the whole thing as I have the opportunity! I saw this when it was shown on Masterpiece Theatre but I found this Fanny just a bit too pouty. I think I will have to watch the one I saw years ago at the movies so I can compare. Mrs. Norris is just so condescending to Fanny and nasty. Mrs. Bertram is not as oblivious as she is made out to be either. As for the side saddle, I wasn’t aware that the Regency version was so different and less safe. My daughter has ridden side saddle and she says it is a definite challenge after riding astride for so long. But I must say the riding habits look fabulous! Thank you for this as I enjoyed all the little details pointed out. There was also a bust in Sir Bertram’s office that I really liked!

    • beth on May 9, 2016 at 3:13 pm
    • Reply

    I have always loved Mary Crawford and could not handle Fanny Price. Fanny + Edmund reminds me too much of Jane + Bingley–too much of the same personality and very little to complement or improve. Thus, MP is by far my least favorite of Austen’s works, but I am now committed to giving it another chance. 🙂

    • Deborah on May 10, 2016 at 7:07 am
    • Reply

    I have never liked Mary or Henry Crawford. Such scheming opportunists. I did know about the dangers of the early sidesaddle. I am glad that when riding sidesaddle I have had the use of the modern side saddle. Thank you for your commentary. I am learning a lot while watching this film. I am looking forward to part 2, the end of the week.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.