No, this is not really a post recommending reading side-by-side with another person, enjoyable as that is. This is about the concept of reading two books side-by-side. Not just any two books, though, but a pair especially made to go together: “companion” novels. Allow me to explain.
I wrote my fifth novel, Miss Georgiana Darcy of Pemberley, as a “companion” to my first. Darcy and Elizabeth dominated The Darcys of Pemberley, which was as it should be, but I always felt like I might have shortchanged the other Darcy: Georgiana. I kept thinking there was more to her story that deserved to be told and wondering what to do about it.
Then I remembered a pair of novels by Julia Quinn that I had read a few years before: The Lost Duke of Wyndham and Mr. Cavendish, I Presume. It was essentially the same story in both books, just told from the widely divergent viewpoints of the two gentlemen involved. And what’s more, it worked beautifully! Each novel stood well on its own merit, but together they made a fuller, more complete story.
So that’s what I decided to do. Rather than going back to amend TDoP into a longer second edition in order to give Georgiana more space on the page, I left the original as it was and wrote the new novel to augment it, this time telling the tale from Georgiana’s perspective – still plenty of D&E but filling in Georgiana’s thoughts and all her previously “off-camera” escapades.
The idea was that, like the Julia Quinn novels, my pair would each stand alone but be better and tell a more complete story when combined. With that in mind, I synced the chapter numbers of the second book with the first and suggested the two could even be read side-by-side, alternating back and forth chapter by chapter, for the richest reading experience.
Although I offered this suggestion in the Author’s Foreword of MGDoP and whenever I talked about the new book, Debbie Fortin – literature lover, consummate JA fan, and friend to JAFF authors everywhere – may be the only one who ever took me up on it. (Although if there are others, I’d love to hear from you too!)
I was delighted when Debbie, whom I have known several years from our internet contact, told me she’d completed the challenge! I was also curious about her parallel reading experience which she accomplished via the audio versions of the books. As is typical for Debbie, she went the extra mile by patiently answering all my questions:
Q: What made you take up my challenge of reading these two books together, Debbie?
A: I always thought it would be fun to try it, but I was so busy that I put that on the back burner at first. Then recently, when listening to the newest book in the series (The Ladies of Rosings Park) as an audio book, it brought back to my mind the idea of reading Miss Georgiana of Pemberley and The Darcys of Pemberley together.Q: I love audio books myself, but why did you choose that format for this reading challenge? Do you think it enhanced the experience? A: Although I love to read, my time is very limited. So, since I commute 2 hours a day, I decided to listen to the audio in the car rather than waiting even longer to read the pair. It was also nice that I could listen while doing household chores. I really appreciated that even though the books were written over a span of a few years, the same narrator was used for the whole series. It enhanced the listening enjoyment as the characters’ voices were consistent throughout.
Q: Have you ever read “companion” novels like this before? A: No, I never have.
Q: What do you think were the pluses and minuses of reading both books together? A: The biggest plus was hearing the Darcys’ views of something that occurred followed immediately by Georgiana’s personal experience of either the same event or during the same time frame. The only minus was that I would sometimes get so into whichever book I was listening to that I would listen too long, forgetting to stop and switch back to the other one.
Q: Would you recommend others try reading these two books side-by-side, or would it be just as well to read them separately, in your opinion? A: I did read The Darcys of Pemberley on its own when it first came out, and I have since listened to Miss Georgiana Darcy of Pemberley on its own as well. I enjoyed both, but reading them together increased my appreciation of these works, giving the story more cohesiveness.
Thanks for the feedback, Debbie!
In true above-and-beyond-the-call-of-duty form, Debbie has taken the idea of parallel reading one step further. As we were messaging back and forth, I told her that I was thinking about making a chart to show how all my P&P novels fit together (with each other and with P&P itself) chronologically, possibly even adding to it the many “missing scenes” I’ve written as well.
With that, Debbie was off and running. She’s undertaken to create a chart showing how all the missing scenes from our two group compilations – Pride and Prejudice: The Scenes Jane Austen Never Wrote (now out of print), Pride and Prejudice: Behind the Scenes – and match them up as to how they fit into the timeline of the original novel. Sounds like a huge job to me, but Debbie said,
“I think that would be so much fun. I just have to finish getting the timeline together. I have thought about doing this for a number of years, and this has been the catalyst to get me serious about accomplishing it.”
I hope she will share it with us when it’s complete! Can you imagine lining up all three volumes, side by side by side, and reading them in parallel fashion chronologically, with all the blanks now filled in?
Have you ever attempted this sort of thing with these or other books? What were the results?
“I am reading six books at once, the only way of reading; since one book is only a single unaccompanied note, and to get the full sound, one needs ten others at the same time.” – Virginia Woolf
14 comments
Skip to comment form
I have always been a Virginia Wolfe style reader; it’s far from unusual for me to be reading four or five books at once. It’s pretty much the norm. But I have never read books in tandem, and it sounds utterly fascinating!! I may have to try it with your Darcy’s of Pemberley books. It’s also quite rare for books to be written thus so that they can be read in this way. I’d love to know of other books that are written to be read thus.
Thanks for sharing this method of reading; I’m not sure I would have thought of it myself!
Warmly,
Susanne 🙂
Author
You’re right, Susanne. I don’t think there are many (or any others at all?) written that way . The modern way seems to be to tell all points of view at once in the same novel. I don’t think even Julia Quinn’s pair are synced by chapter. I read them one after the other, not side-by-side.
To read my DoP series chronologically, you’d have to start with P&P, adding The Ladies of Rosings Park when Elizabeth goes to Hunsford. Then when P&P finished, continue with “Ladies” for a while. At a certain point, you’d add TDoP and MGDoP, so you’d have a three-way overlap until TLRP ended and dropped out. Continue with the other two together to their conclusions, then follow up with Return to Longbourn. Simple, right? Haha! Do you see why I need a chart to explain it?
I too read 4 or 5 books art he same time on different tablets, computers, or my phone each in different rooms or at work. I have never read books on tandem before so this was a novelty.
That’s an intriguing approach, Shannon. I suppose you could do it with some of the books that tell P&P from Darcy’s point of view as well; you could go back and forth between the original and the retelling.
What I’ve done with some of my favorite books is find them in another language which I can read, and go back and forth with a chapter in the second language, then that chapter in English, then continuing in the second language, then back to English. (Though sometimes I may do more or less than a chapter, depending on how the reading is going, where I get stuck, or how absorbed I get in the story.) I recommend this for people working on reading skills in another language (including English). But it also deepens my appreciation for the book, making me pay attention to details and slow down and enjoy it more!
Sometimes there are also funny bits in the translation. I read Harry Potter this way. In one scene, Ron is in the hospital and calling for Hermione–the English goes something like “My-o-nee!” And the translation I read translated this as a phrase meaning, “Oh, my knee!” 🙂
Great examples of parallel reading, Brenda! Thanks for sharing them with us. Wish I had the ability to read in two different languages so I could try your method. I’ve wondered how accurate the translations are too. One of my books has been translated into Hungarian, but it’s not like i speak the language and can check.
Your “Oh, my knee!” story reminds me of some of the things I see on closed captioning (which I sometimes turn on if the actors have thick accents that I find difficult to understand). In the movie Possession, there’s a place where a gal with a heavy Yorkshire accent is showing a couple their hotel room, pointing out the features. When she says “cupboards,” the closed captioning translation is “bluebirds”! Makes me laugh, but also makes me shake my head a little.
I love your story about “Oh my knee.”
I have not read a translation parallel with a book in English but I did struggle through a German translation of Anne McCaffrey’s Dragonsinger when I was in Germany 40 years ago with my German English dictionary. Reading the Book side by side with the translation would have been much easier.
Thank you for such a wonderful idea. I will have to try this with Pride and Prejudice.
Hi, Debbie! My specialty is language learning, and this is a great way to improve your reading in a second language. And it’s fun!
I have all 6 books you mentioned, 4 of your own works plus ‘Scenes’ and ‘Behind the Scenes’, although I only have the last two as Kindle e-books whereas I have your 4 books on Kindle and Audible. This is a challenge I like and am going to give it a try. I will have to read at least part of Chapter 1 of TDoP so when I come to that part in TLoRP I’ll know when to pick up TDoP and MGDoP. As for the S and BtS, I’ll tackle adding them in later….sigh. It would probably be easier if I had the printed book, but I’m still going to give tandem reading a try. BTW, what do you currently have in the works? I recall your post about breach of promise suits. Will what you learned about them play a part in your next book?
Author
Thanks for your comments, Linda! I like your spirit – that you’re game to try it! Sounds like you read my comments to Susanne, so you have a good idea of how my P&P books fit together. Whereas TDoP and MGDoP fit together perfectly with synced chapter numbers, the others are not quite so obvious. That’s where a chart would come in handy.
I’m primarily working on a NA sequel and a JA devotional based on her prayers. Read this post and the two that follow if you’re interested: https://shannonwinslow.com/2018/06/29/coming-attractions/ The breach of promise concept was for one of my other books: For Myself Alone. No waiting if you want to read that one. It’s available in PB, Kindle, Nook, and Audio. 🙂
I am working on the timeline and have almost completed Volume 1 of Pride and Prejudice along with the coinciding chapters of both Scenes and Behind the Scenes.
I know you will enjoy reading TDoP and MY ToP together.
I am not sure if I have done a side by side reading of a companion book. However, I have read 2-3 books around the same time. When I am at home – I have my kindle, where I have most of my books . Outside the house, on my downtime off work, I only have my iphone so I read ibooks. When driving I play my audible books. At the end of the day/week. I seem to jumble the stories/events so at times I have to re-read the books ;)…
Now that you mentioned this complementary books, I might try it. At least the stories/background are parallel to each.
Author
I hope you will give it a shot! Yes, at least the characters and timeline are the same, so less confusion, hopefully. I always have at least two books going at once – one at home, an audio book in the car, and possibly something I’m reading for my current writing project. As long as they are different enough from each other, I don’t usually get them mixed up, but it is a risk! Thanks for your comments. 😀
I did forget to add I also listen to audio books during my commute. I usually don’t mix up storylines, but if I leave too much time before I go back to a particular story I go back a couple of paragraphs to get my bearings. So perhaps going back a few paragraphs might help.
And speaking of complementary books I wonder how Stanley Hurd’s. Darcy’s Tale matches with Pride and Prejudice since it is Pride and Prejudice from Darcy’s POV divided into 3 volumes.
Sounds like your project just got a little bigger, Debbie!