Note to readers: I have been using a working title of The Darcys in Venice for this continuing story, but now so much of it has accumulated that we are only a few installments away from The End, and I plan to publish it in book form. I wanted a better title, and thought Jane Austen Unmasked would be intriguing, because of the Venice setting, and several masked scenes. What do you think? It is true this is a Jane Austen variation story, not about Austen herself, so I hope Jane Austen Unmasked is not too misleading; but as Austen herself said (about her niece Anna’s novel Enthusiasm), it “was something so very superior,” that my common title must appear to disadvantage”!
It is sultry in Venice in August. The Darcys were in the garden, drinking an iced Sorrento lemon drink with assorted biscotti, including fish-shaped baicoli, and Esse biscuits shaped like the Grand Canal. They were hoping for a breeze. Their children were occupied relatively quietly, playing with a kitten and a knitted toy, while Elizabeth read some of Shelley’s poetry to her husband. Lord Byron, their neighbor at the Palazzo Mocenigo, had sent them some volumes of his friend’s work as a compliment, as they were to meet him on his visit to Venice.
“I do like his Hymn to Intellectual Beauty,” Darcy observed, “though mostly for the title, which to my mind celebrates the qualities of my wife.” His eyes twinkled at her, and she blushed.
“So that is what you take from this lovely work, conveniently turning it to a compliment to me? Very pretty, Mr. Darcy.”
“I do,” he replied seriously. “‘That messenger of sympathies/ that wax and wane in lovers’ eyes.’ That is your quality, my dear.”
“Very fine. As long as you do not do as the poet says here – ‘Sudden, thy shadow fell upon me/ I shrieked and clasped my hands in ecstasy.’ That is far too melodramatic!”
He smiled, and returned, ‘No, such a passage would not be to your taste. How about this, then? ‘I vowed that I would dedicate my powers/ To thee and thine.’ Have I not kept my vow?”
“Indeed you have,” she assured him, “and that is much better. But I confess I prefer his Ozymandias as a poem. I have hardly ever read any thing more magnificent.”
“It is,” he agreed, “‘Look on my works, ye mighty, and despair.’ But I must say, Elizabeth, I have some apprehensions about meeting Shelley. To be sure it is an honor to meet a man of such ability, nay genius; but he has a moral reputation worse that our friend Byron in some ways. An atheist, a free thinker, shockingly irregular in his treatment of young women. I cannot approve of him as a man.”
“Why, Darcy, it is not like you to judge a man by mere hearsay and gossip.”
“It is not gossip, but fact, that he eloped with a girl of sixteen, left her for another, and that his poor wife has lately taken her own life. This is what his brand of free thinking, this new fashioned free love, leads to.”
“We are not to judge,” Elizabeth reminded him, “and in any case he will not be likely to offend us in the course of one dinner. If you will listen to hearsay again, they do say he is more of a gentleman than Byron.”
“Perhaps. In any event, our own principles will not be shaken so easily by two such sinners, clever as they are. And there may be considerable diversion as well as edification, in hearing their conversation. Their discussion of their work and process, and their observations of the world, will be something.”
“And then, when the meeting is over, it will pay rich dividends in enlivening our own further conversation for ever. We can wile away much time in deciding which of the two is wickedest.”
“Oh, that I have decided already. Shelley is the worse. Byron is at least a Christian in name, if not a practicing one. But you can see Shelley’s principles in everything he writes. In this Intellectual Beauty, you see he extols, celebrates the imagination as the gateway to truth, instead of faith.”
“Very true,” said Elizabeth thoughtfully. Then her eye caught the figure of Lydia, passing through the garden moving swiftly toward the gates, without pausing to acknowledge them. She was clasping her child in her arms, and Elizabeth noted with annoyance that she was wearing a diaphanous clinging morning gown of her own.
“Lydia! Where are you going? I hope you are not thinking of disturbing Lord Byron?” Elizabeth questioned somewhat peremptorily, since Lydia had tried this before. “He has company you know – Mr. Shelley, with whom we are to dine. He will not welcome an intruder.”
“I am not going to see Lord Byron, Lizzy. Just a little walk, to try to cool off the babe. It is hotter than Hades here,” she replied impatiently.
“Very well.” She exchanged a glance with her husband as Lydia scurried out of the gates, in the direction of Byron’s apartments. “I know she is going over there.”
“There is nowhere else she could be going, that pathway goes only to his side of the house,” said Darcy, crunching philosophically an almond-filled Cantucci biscuit.
“You seem unperturbed. Do you not realize that it has been Lydia’s intention all along to present Lord Byron with her child, as his own?”
“Of course. What else? She has voiced that declaration multiple times a day ever since it was born. I would have had to stop up my ears or leave Mocenigo in order not to hear it. Would that I could. But if Lord Byron is given to putting it about as much as all that, he must expect to reap what he deserves.”
Seeing Elizabeth’s round-eyed, slightly horrified expression, he apologized, “I am sorry, my dear, to indulge in such a coarse expression. But you see what it is, how easily we catch our manners and morals from our neighbours.”
“I am sure Lord Byron himself is not given to such expressions, with ladies,” she said , eyebrows raised in arch reproach.
“No; perhaps not in mixed company. To ladies he gives other parts of himself. But enough of this, Elizabeth. Why don’t you read to me from the English broadsheets that have come, and clear our minds of poetic morals for a bit? We shall see them in action at dinner, soon enough.”
“And shall we do nothing to stop Lydia? It is true that her conduct with Byron is not our affair, but exposing him to my sister’s forwardness and vulgarity is not neighborly.”
He sighed, frustrated. “By what means do you suggest? In my view, there is nothing to be done, short of tying her down.”
“There you are, then. After all, two geniuses ought to be able to deal with one Lydia.”
15 comments
Skip to comment form
Firstly Elizabeth should put a lock on her wardrobe thus forcing Lydia to rewear her own stained clothing! That may stop her gallivanting? Secondly where is Lady Catherine? They should definitely put her in charge of curbing Lydia, after all she is famed for sharing her opinions and demanding obedience! OK so Lydia never listens to anything she doesn’t want to hear but with no clean clothes to steal she would have little choice.
I think Jane Austen Unmasked is good but maybe a little misleading? Why not just Unmasked🤔? But I will read it anyway 😉🥰🥰
Author
Glynis – You need have no apprehension that Lady Catherine won’t jump in to try to interfere with Lydia. She will, I assure you! As for using Unmasked instead of Jane Austen Unmasked…(whispers) having her name on it may make it sell better…
Glynis said it all. LOL! Put a lock on the wardrobe… that was hilarious. Poor Elizabeth will never wear anything Lydia has worn because the poor girl is so clumsy and destructive that the garments are stained or are in shreds. Elizabeth will need to shop for a whole new wardrobe. I agree that the title is confusing. It could anger some who are expecting to see Jane Austen featured in some way. Glynis suggested Unmasked. I think that was an excellent idea. I could ask, what was unmasked? Venice Unmasked. Desire Unmasked. As Glynis suggested… using Unmasked covers many things within the story. However, it is always the author’s choice. I wish you the best in launching this new work. Blessings.
Author
J.W. Garrett, yeah…I know you and Glynis are right, really. I’ll have to keep mulling this over. But I do want a Jane Austen association word. The Darcys Unmasked? Well, no, that’s misleading too…
As always I take such delight in this story…. I just love Darcy’s and Elizabeth intimacy – just as much as I loathe Lydia’s ways. urghhhh
Very looking forward to the dinner with Shelley – if we get that far and Lydia’s behaviour doesn’t somehow prevent it.
As for the title: I think Jane Austen Unmasked is a bit misleading – and while i absolutely understand the reference, I can foresee some less than kind comments because some readers will have not read the blurb….
I am not very good at ttitles myself, but Glynis suggestion is good. Unmasked: or Unmasked in Venise; Jane Austen in Venise?
One thing I do know – I’lll buy it no matter the title! Unless it is – my salts!!! – “Lydia in Venise”…lol
Author
Noooooo, I won’t do it to you, Mihaela! It will NOT be Lydia in Venice, or Lydia Unmasked! (Lydia Undressed might be suitable, but let’s not go there.) I’m so honored and tickled that you like it. I kind of do like Jane Austen in Venice, but that’s the same problem as Jane Austen Unmasked. People will expect to see HER in Venice!
I confess that my moral fibers have been coarsened, but just what is it that Darcy says that Elizabeth finds so offensive?
Perhaps inserting a colon into the title would be better, like “Jane Austen: Unmasked”.
Author
Oh, Lord Byron really did say that getting girls pregnant is what happened from “putting it about.” That’s what the coarse phrase was.
The colon helps. At this point I’m ready to chuck the whole title search and call it Colin Firth Unmasked…
I’ve very much enjoyed these excerpts and am excited to learn that you are nearing the end and will publish them all together as a book! There was much about this scene I enjoyed, especially the dialogue between Elizabeth and Darcy, but I especially loved the image of Darcy eating biscotti. I don’t know why. Perhaps it’s just that you can create a sense of place and moment so well. (Also, I love biscotti and I love Darcy, so it is a great pairing!)
As for the title, you could simply go with “Unmasked: The Darcys in Venice” or something like that, if you like the word unmasked but are afraid of Jane Austen’s presence in the title leading to some confusion?
Congrats on nearing the end of this creative and beautifully-written book, Diana!
Oh, I see that Glynis and others have already suggested “Unmasked”! Whatever you decide, have fun with producing the book!
Author
But Christina, YOU are the one who has got it! Unmasked alone is better than Jane Austen Unmasked but doesn’t say it all. I really do think “Unmasked: The Darcys in Venice” is by far the best of all! It just pulls the whole idea together. THANK YOU a million! (You get the first free copy and any other perks I can think of!)
I must now channel Lady Catherine de Bourgh and be brutally frank. Lydia Wickham is a nitwit. Elizabeth Darcy is very intelligent. Yet STILL you are letting Lydia raid Elizabeth’s wardrobe (incidentally as she is taller and stouter than her sister Elizabeth’s clothes would not fit her) and do not let Elizabeth take action to prevent it. It is becoming more and more annoying – and unfunny. Please stop lest I become MOST SERIOUSLY DISPLEASED.
Author
I shiver at the mere possibility of distressing either you or Lady Catherine, Kathleen, but of course I know Lydia is twice Lizzy’s size and can’t fit into her clothes. That’s the point! She outbursts them (deliberately). Can you imagine her doing something like nursing, in a high waisted tight Regency gown that’s much too small? Sound of ripping gauze. Now I must REALLY have distressed you, because you can’t unsee that! My apologies, and I (probably) will not play on that theme again. Enough already, I agree.
I too like “Unmasked: The Darcys in Venice.”
I have never understood why Elizabeth’s maid and Darcy’s gentleman’s personal gentleman (probably named Jeeves) have not been able to prevent Lydia’s raids on Elizabeth’s belongings. But as the two ladies (using the word loosely in Lydia’s case) are not the same size and height, I have also been surprised Lydia didn’t just order clothing to fit her and have it all charged to Mrs. Darcy.
Hello! I don’t believe I’ve read any of yours before, but somehow this showed up in my newsfeed. Sandwiched between world news of politics and crime was a link to “Jane Austen Unmasked.”
Naturally I thought someone was spreading scurrilous rumors about our dear author and came prepared to rain fire and brimstone on them. Very relieved to find P&P fanfic instead.
So that’s my opinion on the title.
Off to find the beginning of the story now.