The Launch of THE COMPANION OF HIS FUTURE LIFE

Launch Party for THE COMPANION OF HIS FUTURE LIFE
by Jack Caldwell

Caldwell-117bIt is with a great deal of pride and satisfaction that I announce the official release of my fourth novel, The Companion of His Future Life, my second release through our own imprint, White Soup Press. .

My thanks for this must go to my wonderful team of editors, my own Beta Babes: Amy Robinson and Sarah Hunt for the original on-line version, and Debbie Styne and Ellen Pickles for the published version. Beta Babe #1, my lovely wife, Barbara, oversaw the entire editing process. Ellen Pickles also designed the fantastic cover.

Like Mr. Darcy Came to Dinner, this story had been posted online previously.  Have I changed anything? Not really, except I tightened up the dialogue and plot.

The title comes from Mr. Collins’ pompous proposal to Elizabeth Bennet in Pride and Prejudice, as illustrated below. I explore one of the great mysteries of Jane Austen’s masterpiece: What if Mr. Collins had married Mary Bennet instead of Charlotte Lucas? Would that have changed anything in the events of the novel?

COHFL_coverOh, yeah. One of the major changes is that both Elizabeth and Jane visit the Collinses in Hunsford over Easter. Of course, Mr. Darcy will be there, as stiff and sincere as ever, as well as that loud-mouthed-plot-device you know and love, Colonel Fitzwilliam. There are more surprises in store and I won’t ruin them for you. Let’s just say you’ve never met an Anne de Bourgh like this one.

Before reading the excerpt below, allow me to get up on my soapbox for a moment. The otherwise excellent performance by David Bamber in Andrew Davies’ 1995 adaptation of Pride & Prejudice notwithstanding, Mr. Collins is not a short, sniveling, oily cretin. As Austen herself described him:

He was a tall, heavy-looking young man of five and twenty. His air was grave and stately, and his manners were very formal. Mr. Collins was not a sensible man, and this deficiency of nature had been but little assisted by education or society. (…). The subjection under which his father had brought him up had given him great humility of manner at first, but it was now a good deal counteracted by the self-conceit of a weak head and the consequential feelings of early and unexpected prosperity. A fortunate chance had recommended him to Lady Catherine de Bourgh when the living of Hunsford became vacant, and the respect he felt for her high rank and his veneration for her as his patroness, mingling with a very good opinion of himself, made him altogether a mixture of pride and obsequiousness, self-importance and humility.

In other words, a tall, portly windbag. I refer you to Malcolm Rennie’s portrayal in the 1980 BBC version of P&P.

By the way, how about that cover? The painting is In Love (year unknown) by Marcus Stone (1840-1921). I think Ellen did a great job with it.

On with the excerpt. Below is from Chapter 1 – The Proposal:

~~~

Now, after his marvelous success at the ball at Netherfield where he had made the acquaintance of the nephew of his most esteemed patroness, Mr. Collins steeled himself to make his declaration. There was no time to waste, for his leave from Rosings Park extended only to the following Saturday. As was his wont, he began to practice his suit.

“My dear Cousin Elizabeth…” Is that too flowery? No. “My dear Cousin Elizabeth, almost as soon as I entered the house, I singled you out as the… companion of my future life.” Yes, yes, that is well. “But before I am… I am”—hmm—“run away with by my feelings”—Yes!—“on this subject, perhaps it will be advisable for me to state my reasons for marrying—and moreover, for coming into Hertfordshire with the design of selecting a wife, as I certainly did.” Yes, I should make clear to her my reasons for marrying as well as how my choice must most agreeably settle the concerns of the Bennet family.

Mr. Collins had no misgivings on the prospect of matrimony—not for himself. He prided himself on the quality of his abode in Hunsford, so improved by the attentions of his most exalted patroness. Surely, no lady could be other than overjoyed at the prospect of such a household! However, Lady Catherine had advised him to choose properly.

Choose a gentlewoman for her sake, she had said, and for his own. “Let her be an active, useful sort of person, not brought up high, but able to make a small income go a good way.”

Mr. Collins was not impressed with the manner in which Mrs. Bennet kept house, though it was a pleasant surprise that they did have servants.

Elizabeth Bennet was a lovely woman with sparkling eyes, an agreeable smile, and quite the lush form. Stop it! Beauty is only skin deep, and I should not be tempted by the ways of the flesh! But her mode of expressing herself was worrisome. Her wit and vivacity would be acceptable to Lady Catherine, he thought, when tempered with the silence and respect her rank would inevitably excite. Yes, Cousin Elizabeth must know that rank is important!

His musings were interrupted by a movement in the small bit of wilderness near the house.

***

Mary Frances Bennet was walking from the bit of wood near Longbourn, reading her copy of Fordyce’s Sermons to Young Women. She was attempting to divert herself from the apparent romantic successes of her two eldest sisters. Mary was no expert in the ways of the heart, but no one with two eyes could mistake the admiration Mr. Bingley held for Jane, and it was becoming a certainty that Mr. Collins would settle on Elizabeth.

It would be an understatement to say that Mary Bennet had conflicted feelings. Her life-long study of matters spiritual had only partly offset that she was Fanny Bennet’s middle daughter. She longed for the attentions of a man—a good, righteous man, of course—as much as any of her sisters did. But who could compete with the beauty of Jane or the wit of Elizabeth? Mary might as well as have been wallpaper, so she lost herself in music and reading, waiting for the day God would reward His servant.

Today was that day, but God works in mysterious ways.

So engrossed was she in her book that Mary never saw the tree root, but her foot did not miss it. The only fortunate result of her subsequent fall into a mud puddle was that her book remained undamaged. Carefully rising from the muck, Mary quickly made her way to the rear of the house, where Mrs. Hill was taking in the laundry.

“Oh, Miss Mary!” the good woman cried. “Look at your dress! You poor dear! And breakfast is just served!”

Mary hated being late for breakfast, as her mother was quietest early in the day. “Oh, Hill, I must quickly go change my—”

The housekeeper stopped her with a smile. “Oh, Miss, that is not necessary. Do I not have a nice clean gown for you here? Come, no one is about. Out of your things.”

Mary was scandalized. “Hill! Outside? Do I dare?”

Mrs. Hill shook her head. “Enough of that! Let me help you.”

***

Mr. Collins pulled himself back behind the tree, his hands over his eyes. Surely, he would burn in hell for spying on his cousin! He silently berated himself as he waited for the ladies to return to the house. Minutes later, he peeked around the tree to find he was quite alone. A very abashed clergyman made his way into the house. Try as he might, however, he could not clear the image from his mind: his comely Cousin Mary, standing in her shift and waiting for the housekeeper to exchange her dress.

The Bennet family members were their usual, unruly selves during breakfast. Mrs. Bennet expounded at length on Jane’s fitness to be mistress of Netherfield Park. Her eldest lowered her head in embarrassment, and Elizabeth was clearly mortified for her. The two youngest, Kitty and Lydia, were giggling at their latest plans for meeting militia officers. Only Mary seemed to notice that Mr. Collins was out of sorts.

As the toast was passed to Collins, his eyes caught those of his young cousin. Turning red with remembrance—who knew what a fine, full figure she hid under those dresses of hers!—Collins contemplated his intentions. He glanced at Elizabeth.

Yes, she is lovely—almost as beautiful as the eldest—but will she make Lady Catherine happy? He had wished, in his brief time at Longbourn, that Elizabeth had shown the piety exhibited by her younger sister. Collins was a man and, of course, preferred a pretty face to a plain one.

But his misadventure that morning had given him pause. He had to admit that Miss Mary was agreeable—yes, very agreeable indeed. It would not do to declare himself to Miss Elizabeth until he knew Miss Mary better, he decided.

As breakfast ended, Collins turned to the young lady. “Miss Mary, might I enquire whether you would be agreeable to a discussion of some of the views of Mr. Fordyce?”

Mary blinked in confusion, surprised that he was addressing her. “That… that would be delightful, Mr. Collins.”

***

The next day, Mr. William Collins successfully proposed to Miss Mary Frances Bennet. Thus, our story begins.

~~~

The Companion of His Future Life, a hilarious re-imagining of Pride and Prejudice, is now available in print from Amazon, B&N, and other on-line booksellers. An eBook version is available from Kindle, as well.

~~~

But what’s a launch party without party prizes?  I’m in a generous mood. So TWO (2) lucky commenters of this post will win an autographed print copy of The Companion of His Future Life.

BUTthere’s always a but—you must name your favorite Mr. Collins, and defend your choice, in your comment.

3Collins

I didn’t say it was gonna be easy.

~~~

It takes a real man to write historical fiction, so let me tell you a story.

106 comments

1 pings

Skip to comment form

    • Leslie on February 4, 2014 at 7:01 am
    • Reply

    Was it Bamber or Rennie who would cover his mouth with his fingertips whenever his patroness started talking? That’s the one I like. Loved your book, by the way. I’ve read it twice already!

    1. That was David Bamber–the 1995 version (the one with Colin Firth). IMHO, he did a great job in a miscast role.

      I’m glad you enjoyed COMPANION! Thanks!

    • Vesper Meikle on February 4, 2014 at 7:47 am
    • Reply

    I have always preferred Malcolm Rennie portrayal of Mr. Collins – actually I have always preferred the 1980 version to the Colin Firth series, vastly superior in every way, and yes Mary should marry Mr. Collins
    (I have added your book to my wish list – can’t wait for my birthday next month to find out which books my husband is going to buy me)

    1. I think the casting of the supporting characters in the 1980 version is better than the 1995 version. I also preferred David Rintoul as Darcy and Elizabeth Garvie as Lizzy. However, I won’t say anything against the Firth/Ehle pairing. Not only do think they did an outstanding job, I want to get out of here with my skin intact!

    • Maggie Griscom on February 4, 2014 at 8:12 am
    • Reply

    My favorite is Tom Hollander. I must confess that I haven’t seen the 1980 version so I can’t comment on Michael Rennie. Tom Hollander. while small, was very subtle and I could see him as an educated man, but with little sense and considerable conceit. David Bamber as Mr. Collins was over the top and more baffoon than anything. Mr. Collins was not intended to be soooooooo gross.

    1. I think Hollander gave the most sympathetic portrayal of Collins of any version. He made the character his own. While I’m not sure Austen’s Collins was like that, Hollander’s performance was enjoyable.

    • Katrin W on February 4, 2014 at 8:24 am
    • Reply

    Rennie and Bamber – tough decision between the two of them. I can´t really pick which one of the two is my favourite Mr. Collins – they are equally great and ridiculous! 😀
    But the Tom Hollander was a great Mr.Collins too – loved that he´s so short compared to everyone else.

    Happy launch! I do have your book on my wish-list already since I heard of it´s being published!

    1. Thanks for dropping by!

    • Anji on February 4, 2014 at 8:49 am
    • Reply

    I’ve already come across your book in the Kindle store, Jack. Having tried the sample for free, it’s already on my Wish List!

    When it comes to my fabourite Mr C., the 1940 movie was my first introduction to P & P (I was 11 when I first saw it in the 60s and went straight to my school library to borrow the book the next day). Can’t say as I remember Melville Cooper’s portrayal, though. What I do remember is that’s when I fell in love with Fitzwilliam Darcy! I wasn’t that keen on the 1980 version as I thought the acting was a bit wooden at times and Malcom Rennie’s version hasn’t left any impression. David Bamber gave a brilliant performance despite, as you say, being totally miscast. Tom Hollander seemed a bit wishy washy to me and I can’t remember Guy Henry and have only seen Lost in Austen once. I love everything about Bride and Prejudice. Indeed, it was my first P & P variation, which was then followed by Lost in Austen. I must get my DVD of the latter out next time I’m doing the ironing.

    So, as to my favourite Mr Collins? I think it’s a tie between David Bamber and Nitin Ganatra.

    Colin Firth and Jennifer Ehle are probably my favourite Elizabeth and Will, followed by Aishwarya Rai and Martin Henderson?

    1. My wife’s guilty pleasure is Bride & Prejudice. She adores “No Life Without Wife” and “Take Me to Love.”

        • Carol hoyt on February 4, 2014 at 10:17 am
        • Reply

        Jack I agree with your wife!

        1. I do, too. I love “No Life Without Wife,” especially the tiger!

            • Sheila L. M. on February 7, 2014 at 2:14 pm
            • Reply

            My favorite song is at the beginning – Kites without Strings but also like the other two songs…Bring me to Love is great. No life without Wife – very funny.

    • Amy Z on February 4, 2014 at 9:27 am
    • Reply

    For me, Bamber is the ultimate Collins. 🙂 He’s large and ungainly, looks ridiculous when dancing, scrapes and bows with aplomb… if it looks like a duck… etc.

    Bamber’s portrayal was (IMHO) spot on for Austen’s description of Mr. Collins and I think he showed great acting chops when making himself look like such a bumbling idiot. I loved it!!!

    Amy Z

    1. I have to agree.

    • Carol hoyt on February 4, 2014 at 9:44 am
    • Reply

    My favorites are Hollander and Rennie
    Bomber was too yuck for me ( he gave me the shivers)

    Hollander was so successful and realistic in his kiss butt way as well as his calculating behavior with Elizabeth.

    As for the 1980 version, it is one of my least favorite. The acting is so wooden so unnatural . The 1940 version is fun to watch but not true to the book. Love that the ladies always wear ball gowns!

    Congrats on the new book. Definitely on my wish list. Would love to win it!
    I have all your published books so far !

    1. The 1940 version was strange. They used left-over Gone With the Wind costumes — it looked more like Georgia than Hertfordshire. They made Collins a librarian instead of a vicar. But Edna May Oliver as Lady Catherine was a hoot! And did either Laurence Olivier or Greer Garson ever give a bad performance?

        • Sheila L. M. on February 7, 2014 at 2:18 pm
        • Reply

        I have this version on a VHS tape on which i copied the movie from a TV airing. Yes, it was so obvious that the costumes were Civil War era. And the whole archery episode! Plus the actors were so much older than the parts called for!

    • BeckyC on February 4, 2014 at 9:51 am
    • Reply

    I will say Banner, but it has been awhile since I have seen several of those versions. I may have to fix that. I am in the middle of The Companion of his Future Life and am enjoying it. I like seeing the new relationship between Mary and her older sisters. Thank you for the giveaway.

    • BeckyC on February 4, 2014 at 9:52 am
    • Reply

    Auto fix can be very annoying. I meant Bamber.

    1. Another one for Bamber.

    • anne on February 4, 2014 at 10:18 am
    • Reply

    Bamber’s portrayal was accurate and excellent. He seem to enjoy his role and made the movie memorable. I enjoy your wonderful novels and your post was fascinating and wonderful.

    1. You had to like Bamber’s cameo in The King’s Speech.

  1. Ganatra.

    Hand’s down.

    Why?

    “Roar!”

    Case closed.

    1. Can. Not. Argue.

      “My tub has SUPERJETS!”

    • Carole in Canada on February 4, 2014 at 10:25 am
    • Reply

    L0L! Oh Jack I can’t wait to read this! I have seen all of the P&P movie adaptations as I made it my mission after seeing the 1995 version with Colin and Jennifer (my favourites). Plus, the only one I don’t own is the first one! As for the my favourite Mr Collins, that is a tough one as each gave a marvelous performance but my favourite(s) would have to be Bamber for his obsequiousness and obliviousness and Nintin Ganatra for his laughter and absurdness but also his joie de vivre! Hmmm…now that I write this he is probably my favourite!! As for the Mr Collins in ‘Lost in Austen’, he was downright creepy….

    Congratulations and I love the cover art to your book!!!

    1. Guy Henry did a fantastic job of being the creepiest Collins.

    • Talia on February 4, 2014 at 10:30 am
    • Reply

    I like Hollander. He has a grave look about him. They are all terrific in their own way though. It makes me want to go and watch them all again. Thanks for writing another great book!

    1. Hollander may be the best actor of the bunch, with perhaps the exception of Melville Cooper.

  2. Congratulations on the new release, Jack! Enjoyed the excerpt, I am sure it’s a great read.

    I am torn on this – you are right, it’s not easy! I think both Rennie and Bamber did a really good job at it; I did enjoy Hollander in the 2005 film. I agree he is not as Jane Austen described him physically, but he did a good job of eliciting some sympathy for the character which I don’t think any of the others achieved (nor should they have to either, but just saying). Guy Henry was just… odious in the role (and I didn’t think much of his brothers either!) I don’t recall Mr Collins from the 1940 film but then it is probably 30 years since I’ve seen it, and all I can recall of Ganatra in Bride & Prejudice is that he more comical than odious.

    Like I said – I am torn! I think if I have to define my ‘favourite’ interoperation, I will go with Tom Hollander (I just love him as an actor) even though it’s not the most accurate.

    1. His bit with the flower–both at the ball and before his proposal–was pure pathos. You really felt for the guy.

    • Christie on February 4, 2014 at 10:42 am
    • Reply

    I would have to say my favorite Mr. Collins is Hollander (although Hollander was not the Austen described Collins, he did wonderful in the part-he’s a phenomenal actor!). To me, Rennie seems Bamber on the other hand made my skin crawl-just too gross and WAY off Austen’s description (although it is by far my favorite adaptation).

    1. Another Hollander fan. Thanks!

    • schilds on February 4, 2014 at 11:36 am
    • Reply

    I like Tom Hollander’s performance. Though not quite as described by Jane Austen. I liked seeing him be out of place such as his curtsey instead of a gentlemans bow before LADY CATHERINE. By the end I felt rather sorry for him.

    1. Hollander’s catching fire!

  3. Congratulations on your latest release, Jack. The premise of the story has piqued my interest as I think Mary and Mr Collins are compatible and have the same temperament. Opposites attract but some people marry a person who share a similar interest like them.

    I would like to say that I like the portrayals of David Bamber, Guy Henry and Nitin Ganatra but I think Nitin’s portrayal is the best. He’s so funny and ridiculous that I always laugh when he appears on screen.

    1. In a way, his “Collins” is sympathetic, too, especially when he is back in the USA.

    • Deborah on February 4, 2014 at 12:26 pm
    • Reply

    I would have to say that Tom Hollander would have to be y favorite Mr. Collins. The way Collins lears at Elizabeth like he’s a hawk looking at his prey just gives me the shivers…it’s creepy feeling. (Reminds me of a former boy friend wanna be) He doesn’t make eye contact when proposing and seems to be trying to convince himself Elizabeth is the right choice as much if not more than proposing to her. Then when Elizabeth’s mom is trying to convince Mr. Bennet to make Lizzy marry Mr. Collins he can be seen preening in the mirror in the background. Holland made him so ridiculous it brought humor to the self-important, self-righteous, obsequious character.

    1. Hollander is all over the place, and yet keeps his portrayal grounded. Darn good acting.

    • Stephanie L on February 4, 2014 at 1:10 pm
    • Reply

    Tom Hollander is my pick. Not as oily or obsequious as Bamber but still a rather self-important ridiculous little man. I DID think he was a bit small (my apologies Mr. Hollander) for the part, but thought he did it very well. I always enjoy your books Mr. Caldwell, looking forward to this one.

    1. Thanks, Stephanie.

  4. My pick is Tom Hollander. Stephanie L hit the point of his height, but his portrayals in Pirates and Gosford shows his acting range of arrogance and desperation. His portrayal of Mr. Collins is creepy as mentioned above plus add slimy and calculating – grand character for you to twist! The excerpt above convinced me – “the Companion of His Future Life” is on my wish list!

    Good luck with your launch!

    1. And another one for Hollander!

      • Deborah on February 4, 2014 at 5:46 pm
      • Reply

      Liked your appraisal with the word slime, my second thought is sceevy.

  5. First of all, Jack — HUGE congrats on your release!!! The book looks and sounds fabulous 😉 .
    And, when it comes to a favorite Mr. Collins, it’s a tossup between Rennie and Bamber for me. I love Hollander as an actor, but I spent much of that version feeling sorry for him, and I most definitely did *not* feel sorry for the Collins in the novel, LOL. The Garvie/Rintoul film version of P&P was the first one I ever saw, just a couple of years after it was released (and just weeks after I read the novel for the first time), so in a lot of ways, I imprinted on those character portrayals. But I could happily watch just about any version of the movie at any time. I love the insights and subtleties that all the actors (Collins and otherwise) bring to the story!

    1. Thanks, Marilyn. I must admit, my favorite version of P&P is that 1980 Rintoul/Garvie version. Not only does everyone look right, they sound right. It’s funny! Andrew Davies took a lot of the humor out of the story in 1995, for the sake of drama.

  6. If we’re talking canon, I’l have to say Malcolm Rennie – you’re right, he looked closest to Jane Austen’s description, although I wish Fay Weldon didn’t go so wildly off-course (what was with the weird hat-contraption that Mr Collins ended up wearing???). On the other hand, if we’re talking about an actually likeable Mr Collins, I’ll have to say Tom Hollander hands down – if it wasn’t for Mr Darcy, I might have rooted for him to get the girl 🙂

    1. You make some good points.

    • Erika Messer on February 4, 2014 at 3:47 pm
    • Reply

    Oh my goodness I want to read this! I am NOT a fan of Mr Collins however the thought of reading a story where Lizzy marries him appeals to me 🙂 Just to see what happens! She would have put him in his place one day 1 LOL! Thank you 🙂

    1. There are stories in JAFF World were Lizzy marries Collins. This is not one of them. I think Mary can hold her own. Thanks for stopping by!

        • Erika Messer on February 4, 2014 at 11:31 pm
        • Reply

        Oh my gosh I totally read that wrong – actually this makes more sense to me because I always wondered why in the original P&P he never considered Mary as a wife – I always thought she was more like HIM than any of the other girls. I do think Mary can hold her own – I believe she has a great strength of character as is shown in the original book and I think her and Mr Collins will make a great couple! Now I REALLY can’t wait to read it 🙂 Thank you!

    • Ceri on February 4, 2014 at 5:34 pm
    • Reply

    I haven’t seen Lost in Austen, and only seen Bride and Prejudice once so can’t make a judgement on those portrayals of Mr Collins. Of the remainder, I thought 95 did a good job of being slimy and objectionable, but it was over the top and he’s wrong physically, as is 2005 Collins, although he was acted closer to how he should have been. I think the closest to Austen’s Mr Collins was probably 1980’s version. However, my personal favourite is the 1940 vintage. He is pompous and self important, but I find him quite funny too, which makes me fond of him despite myself. Plus, he has his own music whenever he comes into the scene! I know the 1940 version had a lot wrong with it, but it was the first version I saw which gives it a special place in my heart, and I felt it kept true to the spirit of the story, even though it wasn’t entirely faithful to period or plot 🙂

    1. The 1940 version was probably the funniest of the crop, with Bride & Prejudice coming in a close second.

    • Cyn209 on February 4, 2014 at 6:40 pm
    • Reply

    congrats to Jack!!!!
    I cannot wait to read this one!!!!

    1. I hope you enjoy it! Thanks!

    • Michelle Fidler on February 4, 2014 at 7:48 pm
    • Reply

    I’ve seen the one with Tom Hollander so I’ll pick him. Of course, Mr. Collins is always annoying, no matter who plays him. I believe that I’ve seen Lost in Austen and I got it through an interlibrary loan. Haven’t read any of your books yet but I want to.

    1. I hope you have a chance to read them soon. I think your library may have DVDs of these other P&P adaptations, so check ’em out.

  7. Congratulations! I really like the cover of your book.

    To me, Malcolm Rennie always seems close to Austen’s description of Mr. Collins. However, my favorite would have to be Nitin Ganatra — Mr. Kohli was perfectly ridiculous.

    1. That’s a heck of a cover, ain’t it?

    • TLeighF on February 4, 2014 at 8:21 pm
    • Reply

    I already read your book and really enjoyed it! My favorite Collins is Cooper because I thought he was the closest to the way Austen wrote him. The proposal scene is just hilarious! Glad to have you at Austen Variations, Jack….I love your humor. Are you going to post your P&P from Darcy’s POV here? (Please say yes, please say yes, please say yes…)

    1. Your wish is my command. It will be posted at the end of the month. Good thing February is short, huh?

  8. Definitely David Bamber except he’s a little too short for the way he’s described in the book, but he certainly is oily and repulsive. I love Tom Hollander as an actor and he’s my second choice.

    1. Another Bamber-babe! (sorry, I couldn’t resist)

    • Ann on February 4, 2014 at 9:14 pm
    • Reply

    Oh Jack what a question… Loved the book by the way, I read the kindle version a few weeks ago. I have never seen the 1940 or 1980 versions and after reading all the post comments it seems I will need to correct that. Bamber did a great job of being yucky! I never cared for the Hollander version of Collins, so I would have to say the Bride and Prejudice version would be my favorite Collins.

    1. My wife, the lovely Barbara, agrees. Thank you for the kind words about COMPANION.

  9. I forgot to mention that I love the cover. It’s very beautiful and the font of the title and colour scheme used compliments the gorgeous painting. Your designer has done a fabulous job making it stand out from the rest of Austenesque books, Jack.

    1. Ellen Pickels of Communication Arts did the cover.

    • Michelle on February 4, 2014 at 11:22 pm
    • Reply

    Rennie is more what I pictured in my head when I read the book. I thought he fit the description of the character well. He seemed harmless and weak-headed. Bamber felt more sinister in some way to me than the character was described but I really enjoyed him and what he did with it. I guess I would say for accuracy, Rennie is my favorite but for sheer feeling, I liked Bamber best.

    1. I agree with Bamber being slightly sinister–he was the inspiration for my Collins in MR. DARCY CAME TO DINNER. Rennie is the model I used in COMPANION.

    • Patricia finnegan on February 4, 2014 at 11:24 pm
    • Reply

    ive always thought 1995 version was the best portrayal for mr. Collins. I do have to say that I think 2005 version was pleasing to look at though 🙂

    congratulations on new book!

    1. I’m sure Hollander would like that.

    • junewilliams7 on February 5, 2014 at 12:05 am
    • Reply

    David Bamber was great, but oh so despicable as a match! I truly felt sorry for Charlotte, but he was everything Lady Cat would want. In contrast, Nitin Ganatra was laughable but sympathetic, more comic than ewwwww. So I suppose Nitin would be my favorite modern Collins, and Bamber my favorite Regency Collins. How’s that for waffling for an answre?

    1. Not bad, not bad at all.

    • Kathy on February 5, 2014 at 1:04 am
    • Reply

    I have to admit I haven’t seen all versions of Mr. Collins, so I am not sure I should weigh in. But I have to say I am always riveted by the proposal scene between Tom Hollander-Keira Knightley. She is so extremely mortified and he is so amazingly obtuse! Collins is also more sympathetically portrayed by Hollander, and seems less creepy than other renditions. Of the 4/6 I’ve seen, Guy Henry in Lost in Austen was particularly oily and creepy.

    1. Guy Henry just oozed creepiness.

    • Sophia Rose on February 5, 2014 at 2:34 am
    • Reply

    I would be fine with either Malcolm or Nitin because I felt that in both versions they relied on humor and sharing a wink with the audience making Mr. Collins more of an oblivious, but not unkind man. Not the sharpest knife in the draw and certainly full of himself, but not harmful like Wickham either.

    Congratulations on the release of this new book. I love the direction you have taken the story and the excerpt certainly heightened my eagerness to read it. Thanks for your generous giveaway opportunity.

    1. The thing with most of Austen’s work is that there is so little true evil in her novels. She relies on humor, particularly the humor of watching proud idiots spout off. For real bad people, fans should read MANSFIELD PARK (Aunt Norris), SENSE AND SENSIBILITY (Mrs. Ferras), or LADY SUSAN. Interesting that her worse villains are female.

    • Niki G on February 5, 2014 at 7:34 am
    • Reply

    Will there be any Nook love for those of us who don’t like the Kindle? At least an epub somewhere would not go unpurchased.

    Cooper reminded me a bit of the stoned caterpillar in Alice in Wonderland, but he was amusing. I guess Bamber or Ganatra would be my choice. Bamber’s high on the list because his Collins is more memorable than the others to me. Ganatra’s performance is just such fun to watch and he looks like he was really enjoying the role, so I guess that’s my favorite Collins. To be fair to Hollander, I couldn’t get that far in the 2005 version to see his performance — that movie was awful.

    1. There will be a NOOK version down the road–stay tuned.

      Try to give the 2005 film another shot. I have my issues with it–I disliked Dame Judi Dench’s interpretation of Lady Catherine–but the director was trying to cram the entire novel into a two-hour film. After watching it a few times, I see he got the feelings of Lizzy and Darcy right. Lizzy is young, and the mistakes she makes is because she is young. The film is funny and the shots are gorgeous. Keira Knightley is a very good actress, and Kelly Reilly is the perfect Caroline Bingley ice-queen.

    • Deborah on February 5, 2014 at 9:43 am
    • Reply

    I forgot to mention, when I commented on my favorite Collins, that I love the cover. Beautiful job.

    1. I’ll tell Ellen.

    • Cindy on February 5, 2014 at 9:57 am
    • Reply

    I enjoyed reading this Jack! I got it as soon as it hit Kindle. 😉

      • Cindy on February 5, 2014 at 10:46 am
      • Reply

      And I didn’t follow the directions. My fave Collins was Ganatra. I thought Bamber fit Jane Austen’s Collins -equal parts unintelligent, condescending, bumbling, and creepy. 😉

      1. Thanks for getting the book.

    • Lynn on February 5, 2014 at 11:15 am
    • Reply

    I will have to go with Bamber. There are several movies there I have not seen, so I’m going to have to remedy that! I just like how bumbling he is. He has synchophatic down perfectly! And I’m sure I’ll have your book relatively soon – I just can’t stop myself!!

    1. It’s like potato chips–you can’t have only one!

    • dianna A. on February 5, 2014 at 11:59 am
    • Reply

    very excited to read it

    1. Thank you.

  10. Bamber ‘s inimitable interpretation of Collins is the winner for me!
    bumbling and stumbling – his moral sentiments add so much humour to what he believes sacred…
    his reaction to Lydia in mid dress, then his later demeanor when he comes to ‘counsel’ the cousins at Lydia’s elopement –
    Bamber is a definite addition to the movie and to Rev Collins’ repertoire!

    1. and…
      HUGE compliments on the gorgeous new book!
      added to goodreads and celebrating with you, Jack – CONGRATS !!

      1. Thanks for the Goodreads shout-out!

  11. The book’s cover is fantastic, it’s really a great job! I love the idea and the excerpt!
    As Mr Collins I love David Bamber, I saw it in other plays and I think that he did his better to pait the caracter in the good way. Above all I love the speaking he used.
    Good luck for your book!

    1. Thank you so much.

    • Vee on February 7, 2014 at 3:36 am
    • Reply

    Congrats on the release of your fourth novel Jack! Great excerpt, the story sounds like a lot of fun! I look forward to reading the novel in its entirety very soon. I know it shouldn’t make a difference but most of the books I read are by women. So I thoroughly enjoy your story telling from a mans perspective 🙂
    1980 Pride and Prejudice is the adaptation I first fell in love with and Mr Collins is portrayed more like Jane Austen’s version. He is awkward and clumsy. I love that aqua hat or whatever Charlotte called it. The look on her face in that scene is hilarious.
    My favourite is David Bamber, Andrew Davies adaptation is exceptional. Guy is the creepiest by far!

    1. I can’t argue with any of that. Thanks.

    • JoAnne Turner on February 7, 2014 at 11:10 am
    • Reply

    I’m gonna buck the trend here a bit and declare that the Collins I like best is Maxwell Glick, who portrayed Ricky Collins in the YouTube/Twitter/Facebook re-telling “The Lizzie Bennet Diaries”. He wasn’t portly, by Jane Austen’s description, but he was so earnest and enthusiastic about things that he clearly had no clue about. It was the first Collins I had seen at whom I truly enjoyed laughing. Other performances were brilliant, but bored me a little with the long speeches and subservient ways. (Plus I just went “EWWWW” when they tried to “get carried away by [their] feelings”.)

    If you haven’t seen “The Lizzie Bennet Diaries,” I highly recomend it. The same people are currently in the middle of a “Emma” retelling entitled “Emma Approved”

    1. Y’know, I missed that one. I’ll have to check it out. Thanks.

        • JoAnne Turner on February 7, 2014 at 10:13 pm
        • Reply

        Just Google “Lizzie Bennet Diaries”. And be prepared for a long viewing….one hundred four minute or so videos in the main section, then two or three side stories.

        and by the by, LOVE the cover of the new book!

    • Sheila L. M. on February 7, 2014 at 2:41 pm
    • Reply

    Owning copies of each movie in one form or another, I have to say that I think Rennie most fits Jane Austen’s descriptions. His scene with the hat on while planting whatever and the looks Charlotte and Elizabeth exchange are priceless! Bamber stands out in my mind, when Collins is mentioned in most conversations, as that is the version of the movie I have watched the most often. But he is so over the top…just his hair, alone, turns me off and then he keeps scraping and bowing to Lady Catherine. Tom Hollander is the best looking of the bunch and I loved his performance in “Wives and Daughters”. Nitin Ganatra’s scene at the table is very funny but, to me, he is not Mr. Collins. I can’t remember Guy Henry’s acting even though I own the DVD (will have to watch again but have Bride & Prejudice playing in the background at present.) So my vote for favorite goes to Rennie as he most portrays Jane’s description of the role.

    1. You and me both.

    • Sheila L. M. on February 7, 2014 at 2:47 pm
    • Reply

    Oh, BTW: love the cover on the book, also, which is now on my wish list, also. Will definitely get it one way or another. Always thought Collins should have married Mary.

    1. It you read the book, you’ll see how it comes out. You might be surprised!

    • Boston Sheryl on February 8, 2014 at 3:32 pm
    • Reply

    I am late to the party, but I could not pass up on the fun of comparing the Mr. Collinses! I’ve seen all the films except Bride & Prejudice, and I must say that David Bamber was my favorite. He was so…GREASY! And sniveling…and pompous…and had such an affected manner…and was genuinely, undoubtedly stupid. When Elizabeth tricks him into leaving after he comes to the Bennet household to pay his condolences after Lydia had run off, I howled. He fancies himself in love with Charlotte Lucas two minutes after Lizzy’s rejection of his ridiculous marriage proposal. He can’t stop talking about Lady Catherine; he can’t dance; he can’t play whist. Where does it end?? Tom Hollander was good, but he did not come across as the type of totally ridiculous man Lizzy would have rejected; he’s halfway tolerable. Guy Henry was also very good, but choosing voluntarily not to consummate his marriage?? Not believable, even for a man so immersed in Fordyce’s sermons. So there you have it!

    Can’t wait to read your book – I, too, always thought Mary Bennet should have been the one to marry Mr. Collins.

    • Nora Moore on February 9, 2014 at 10:57 am
    • Reply

    I liked Ganatra actually… he was just so ridiculous you felt sorry for him & liked him (in a sympathetic way) at the same time.

    • Chanpreet on February 10, 2014 at 11:30 am
    • Reply

    Congratulations on the re-launch of your book! I must admit to have never read an Austen adaptation written by a guy. Of course I’ve never met a guy who has read the book and loved it either, but I’m really looking forward to reading it and seeing if there is a difference between male and female Jane Austen fan writers.

  12. Hello! I could have sworn I’ve visited this site before but after looking at a few of
    the posts I realized it’s new to me. Nonetheless, I’m certainly pleased I
    found it and I’ll be book-marking it and checking back regularly!

  1. […] Caldwell Story URL: Story Link – Amazon Story URL: Story Link – B&N EXCERPT URL: Excerpt from Chapter 1;  Excerpt from Chapter 2 Word count: 244 pages Summary: One of the great “what-ifs” among […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.